THE DISPUTE EINSTEIN-BERGSONSummary: This thesis aims to open a new avenue of discussion regarding the issue of the boundaries between science and philosophy. We have focused this discussion in the debate between Einstein and Bergson on time. Our thesis part of the conviction that the definition of time is not understood if we do not approach the work of an author from the discursive dimension specifically, as we believe that, in philosophy, the constitution of meaning depends on a process that is discursive and possible capture a significant portion of the media lingüsticos this speculative activity. We therefore understand what operations lingüsticas allow the development of writing bergsoniana. Furthermore, we intend to prove that Bergson's detractors have not understood the discursive framework that the text proposed and that his perspective was that of another ideological field, in science, with a universe lingüstico own. Berson critical time for the concept of science, and culminates complete relativity, because it contrasts with the length that the author asks us to think. In science, time is because the level of space as a fourth dimension to it. The scientific method distorts, as Bergson, the real, because only interested in what can be translated into concepts. Therefore, our work shows how science progresses further through the concepts of theories. From this perspective, we can understand what the "implicit metaphysics" of these concepts. For ejemplificarlo, we look at the concept of simulataneidad and see how the scientific method assumes a reality divisible into moments stable and autonomous. Our conclusion is that the discussion between Einstein and Bergson has to be understood as a discussion between ontological and epistemological divergent positions. Eisntein stop doing science when using verbal language and ignores delos symbols. But from the moment he enters this new area, the scientific concepts lose all the security they had in the field of scientific symbols. Then, the discussion about the weather becomes a philosophical discussion. Therefore, Berson is wrong when claims that Einstein said that really does not say what they discussed scientific issues. Einstein was wrong in not wanting to admit that it is within the scope of philosophy and, therefore, its definition time has gained a new perspective.
