METAPHYSICS AND ONTOLOGY

Author: LOZANO DIAZ VICENTE.
Year: 2003.
University: BARCELONA [www.ub.es].
Place of defense: FILOSOFÍA.
Place of preparation: UNIVERSIDAD DE BARCELONA.

Summary: The aim of the thesis is nabrar as conceived Aristotle First Philosophy and what role throughout its pensamiento.La basic idea is that in the same way that reality is an orderly structure in which all the elements are organized from an original and fundamentador, the first engine still or God, the system of science must have intended to reflect the same structure, with one of them making element originating fundamentador.Esta Science is the First Philosophy.

Author: SIRCHIA HELGA.
Year: 2003.
University: BARCELONA [www.ub.es].
Place of defense: FILOSOFIA.
Place of preparation: UV.DEPARTAMENTO FILOSOFIA TEORETIVA Y PÁCTICA.

Summary: The problem of evil in the philosophy Kantiana coincides with the presence of moral evil in man; from this thesis, which is based on research work, and through reading and analysis of some works of Kant, essentially thesis proposes responding to a fundamental question: Do you and the man is good is bad? To try to answer this question, the research methodology is based on a multidisciplinary and historic, so quel live wire dela question of evil has led to highlight the profound relationship between different spheres of philosophical thought Kantiano, such as moral philosophy, the philosophy in history, political philosophy and law, anthropology and philosophy of religion. Indeed, if on the one hand the moral dimension is the area pricipuo where Kant admits considering filosóficamente evil, their origin and segnificado for men, on the other hand not only moral philosophy, but also other historic moments of evolution of thinking Kantiano and other field discipline of his philosophical system are ivolucrado in thinking that the author desrrolló for many years about the problem of evil in human nature.

Author: AGUIRRE SANTOS JOSÉ JAVIER.
Year: 2004.
University: PAÍS VASCO [www.ehu.es].
Place of defense: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN.
Place of preparation: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA Y CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACIÓN.

Summary: This paper consists of three parts: a general introduction to books ByK 1-2 in the Metaphysics of Aristotle, a systematic review of the contents of these books, and translation of the original texts, both the Spanish and Basque. The commentary is based on certain assumptions, which in turn are the general conclusions of the initial investigation and which are described in the Introduction. 1, B-treated Metaphysics is a fundamentally propaedeutic directed to the treatment of the major academic issues to philosophy first. 2-On such issues Aristotle has in some cases the positive solution and in other cases holds an advanced course in the settlement process. 3, B-aporías can only be solved from a level that exceeds the philosophical tradition prearistotélica and from the concepts and doctrines developed primarily in the central books of Metaphysics. 4, B - The book is not directed simply to addressing preliminary first philosophy, but in the same central issues. 5 - The statement of aporías are three levels of content: doctrines naturalists, pitagórico-platónicas and aristotélicas themselves. 6 - The structure of the unit is closely aporías the institutional activity of the SV and IV.

Author: CORAZÓN ARDURA JOSÉ LUIS.
Year: 2004.
University: AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID [www.uam.es].
Place of defense: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA Y LETRAS.
Place of preparation: UAM.

Summary: It is a vindication of the theory aesthetic made in the books and articles of the art critic and poet Barcelona Juan Eduardo Cirlot (1916-1973). Since compression of his theory symbolic, it is systematically articulate reading your books on, posía and others in order to get to know what is the scope of his study, from his articles in specialized press, his work as translator and theory of art books, including the indispensable Dictionary of symbols, Dictionary of the isms, etc..

Author: RENQVIST ANNA-LENA.
Year: 2004.
University: POMPEU FABRA [www.upf.edu].
Place of defense: INSTITUTO UNIVERSITARIO DE CULTURA.
Place of preparation: UNIVERSIDAD POMPEU FABRA.

Summary: The argument assumes that the concept of time, as described by pormera time in Book IV of the Aristotelian Physics is a concpepto insufficient in the account for the full complexity of the phenomenon time. Through a reading of the doctrines of time of Aristotle, Augustine of Hippona becomes propose that each of these speeches hides a concept of time desdoblado, or a dual concept of a single time. This ideá is explicitly stated in the doctrine of time FJWSchelling. According to the thesis here maintained this dual concept is imposed as a category essential from the moment you want to confront the enigma of change, in terms of Aristotle, of salvation, in terms of Augustine, or Schelling, the philosopher main this work, the progress (Fortschritt). Only thus can be thought of the old aporia evoked by Heraclitus, about identity and difference of the passage of time itself. With this notion double is capable of responding on the one hand, the character of ser-dividido with regard to itself - brought by Aristotle-in the nature in general and the nature of time in particular, which corresponds to its how to appear, and on the other, their identical or "unified" to be always the same, which correspone to the fundamental requirement for knowledge of that nature. The role that we play the first word of the title, Eros, is índolo essential, as it appears in mythological terms kantianos causal cause spontaneous or unconditional, is the power to open horizon trained future, thereby being responsible for the phenomenon main this thesis, the time, understood in this sense the word twice. This is very different notions among themselves to be entitled to ask that it is believed they are the same. The answer is as cost-effective as it is difficult to handle: the articulation of a turning point for one now, or what is true to say the same thing of a past and a future whose meeting point is this. The articulation of a turning point is what, usually means time, although we do pass or not, but is located inside or outside of the soul. According to Aristotle time is not movimeinto but something that accompanies the movement. What they have in common is a structure ecstatic: the time, like the ser-en movimeinto and on the other hand, is something to something. But while being in movimeinto ranging from one term to another, the movement itself, and time with him, never is neither the one nor the other, but is among a half. This means that this is a consummate ecstasy ever: to be without lelgar. Kronos unit is not supported because it lacks the size capable of presenting. Hence there is a time to mark life but it is not. This is the aporía affixed to the Aristotelian concept of time: There is not and there. It is because we realize its wake myself measure, but is not, because none of its dimensions. According to Aristotle, this is because "now" is a limit, but not act in power. As such it is what separates earlier than after, and which ensures the nature of time: its elapse. But to have time, we must also be a unit of measure. This unit is for the "now" as a limit on the act, which feature lies in unity. The act now in one before and after it, thus is the unity of núnero, hence the famous definition of the time: the number of motion as before and after. It is with this background that we can understand Augustine when he says that the time is now and nothing else. Three different present: the past and present memory, the future as esera present, and this attention as this. This corresponds to what Aristotle was the time for measured, or kronos. For this Roman thinker, these present, in ú 8 last in 733 stancia, referring to a simultaneous time that this is the everlasting God. This time the measure as a means of this eternal present, and here is the approach to analysis. The alternation between these two so time is a sine qua non for the fenmeno time. This is what is stated in the doctrine of time Schelling. Taken together these two times is what makes the start thinking along with the progression of thinking, of a say, science or a practice either. They complement so that one without the other is not. What is epic in a while as a kind of "uno-todo" (hen kai bread), has to be born / fall into another in order to be differentiated and determined by the judgment determinatio est negatio. But what we are fragmented, divdiéndose with regard to itself, it refers to a unit "underlying". From time to another is not going on an ongoing basis, but so abrupt: so you fall or jump. The bridge between the two is the power eloquentemente pointed to by Plato: reminicencia, memory that has gone through oblivion.

Author: ARJOMANDI RAD ARASH.
Year: 2005.
University: POMPEU FABRA [www.upf.edu].
Place of defense: DEPARTAMENTO DE HUMANIDADES.
Place of preparation: UNIVERSIDAD POMPEU FABRA.

Summary: The critical current agreement on the philosophical system built by Eugene Trias (which is called philosophy limit) in the proposal philosophical works better and more innovative thinking in English in the second half of the twentieth century. This thesis explores one of the four main areas of philosophical project of Eugenio Trias, his philosophy of religion. This study is done, however, in close connection with other areas of the work of philosopher Barcelona and matching the principal authors classical and modern thinker with which this dialogue in his work. This thesis is to explore, in short, what the response of the philosophy of human reason limit the problem / religious phenomenon.

Author: MONJO BELLIDO EMILIO.
Year: 2005.
University: SEVILLA [www.us.es].
Place of defense: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA.
Place of preparation: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA.

Summary: The single scrptura as a guiding principle of the Protestant Reformation, especially in its scope Calvinist, states as a basis of the proposals of the authors studied (PoNet, Goodman, and Rutherford Mornay) in its claim of responsibility r existence against tyrants.

Author: GONZÁLEZ FISAC JESUS.
Year: 2005.
University: COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID [www.ucm.es].
Place of defense: FACULTAD DE FILOSOFÍA.
Place of preparation: UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID.

Summary: The job facing a dual purpose: methodological and content. Meteorológicamente want to put to us that the work of the Critique of Pure Reason is, as "critical", a work whose nature is phenomenological. This means that this is a job that puts them in the light mode if Reason while concerned for themselves and for their inalienable finitude, which is all of this, what we mean by his facticidad. The copertenencia therefore "object" and "method" of Reason. The facticidad comes to be in the Review in two respects. The logical connection, the fact that knowledge in general is always only as a reflection (such as logos), marked for the main body of the judge. The facticidad the judge is then in the field of "transit", the articulation of the same game as finite faculties. Where such articulation which is key in the finitude of this game. The fact that it is always a certain "dealing with" nothing of Reason, as the feeling (that is) our own being as a people who think. This is what we believe is the "structure" general purpose ". In this regard the "metaphysical" is nothing but the very facticidad of logic in relation to the validity of theoretical knowledge, which is assumed to mean "momentous". In regard teórico-cognoscitivo the facticidad is the finitude of factual knowledge, which is always and in every case as a "theory", which is expressed in the doctrine of the autoafección (or self). The key to esquematismo is in the fact that knowledge can never separated from its factual events, which means that this happen, whether it is empirical as if momentous, be affected by a finitude and the same, of the idealidad phenomenon, which is the birthright of every index prostration theoretical. We have so facticidad now is the condition, as the "feeling" (which is) our own being as beings who know. In this respect it comes to be the metaphysical "empericidad" same knowledge, which is key in the same movement as the fact of our being exposed to the experience (somehow our known as "experience"). "Empericidad" which elaborates insists finitude registry momentous in which rests the speech of the first Review.